Controversy & Campus Reports on Clery Data

December 21, 2015 10:15:30 AM EST / by John Fees

Kelly Field wrote in the November 25, 2015 issue of The Chronicle of Higher Education an important article (“How Much Can Campus-Crime Reports Tell Us About Sexual Assault?”) on what campus crime reports reveal about sexual assaults on college campuses.  

The article opens with the statement "The statistic was shocking: Nine out of 10 colleges reported no rapes on their campuses in 2014." and goes on to discuss the limits and difficulties of reporting sexual assaults.  Kelly Field does an excellent job of outlining the challenges that face higher education leaders and the complexity involved with both definitions and reporting. In the context of CNN Film's airing of a somewhat controversial documentary - The Hunting Ground - and the effort by White House Task Force to Protect Students From Sexual Assault to improve safety it seems like everyone should agree that publishing accurate and timely data is vital.






The issue of accurately reporting campus safety and crime statistics goes beyond issues involving sexual assault.   A quick analysis of the 2014 Clery Act reports of private 4 year colleges and universities with more than 1,000 students would indicate that there are approximately 3 burglaries per campus reported within university residence halls.  

But averages are often misleading.  In fact, 43% of these schools reported ZERO burglaries while at the same time, 35% of schools reported more than 3 burglaries and these same schools actually account for 89% of all reported burglaries.  Is it true 43% of school with residence halls had no crimes or could there be a problem with reporting? And is it really true that 371 of these same institutions (4 year non-profit private institutions with 1,000 or more students with residence halls) also reported no burglaries in 2012, 2013 and 2014?  The Clery data seems implausible.

Could it be true that for more than 3 years these 371 institutions did not experience any burglaries within their residence halls or is it actually something else?

The Student Press Law Center has made transparency of such data a major project and just last year, in conjunction with The Columbus Dispatch, published an important article "Reports on College Crime Deceptively Inaccurate".  


The article reports that "even the U.S. Department of Education official who oversees compliance with a federal law requiring that the statistics be posted on Oct. 1 each year admits that they are inaccurate. Jim Moore said that a vast majority of schools comply with the law but some purposely underreport crimes to protect their images; others have made honest mistakes in attempting to comply."

Accurate and Timely Data on Campus Safety is Required:

The Chronicle article quotes Brett Sokolow, a risk management consultant for colleges and universities, states that "If you look at the surveys, and then look at the numbers colleges are reporting, it looks like a massive cover-up." "Our days of ineptitude have to be done," he added. "Congress is going to shove it down our throat if we don’t do it ourselves."

The article from the Ohio Dispatch, quotes campus-crime researcher Matthew Nobles, a professor at Sam Houston State University,  "said it’s worth questioning whether colleges that report zeros actually have zero crime. It seems unlikely that if you have 10 years of statistics with a university that has on-campus housing and it shows zeros throughout, it’s very, very unlikely that literally nothing ever happens there that could be reportable,” 

It takes only one unreported incident for a college to violate the law. 

What Can Be Done?

A) Leaders Must Commit to Transparency- make sure that the institutions culture supports honest reporting.  Zero's should be the goal and if they are accurate then celebrate them.  However, three years of "Zeros" may be reason for concern. Leaders should, in this case, evaluate the process involved with collecting reports and consider a change.  

B) Accountability by Design.  Brett Sokolow, suggests that more regulation isn't required, but better management may be.   Sokolow "suspects that poor more a function of dysfunction than malfeasance" and asserts "that colleges should be compelled to designate a senior administrator to collect the crime data and "sign off that the numbers are correct," much as they're required to name a Title IX coordinator."

C) Students and their families take notice. Given the pressure on budgets and efforts to grow enrollments, there are strong economic incentives to under-report campus crime.  It is prudent to evaluate the school's Clery Report, read the campus newspaper crime reports and speak with your student about the culture on campus.  

Topics: Student Life, college theft, Financial Literacy, College Life Protected, Student Risk Management, Best Practices by Colleges, Higher Education Policy, Transparency, Risk Management, ACUHOI, Clery Act, Campus Crime, Campus Safety, Higher Education

John Fees

Written by John Fees

John Fees is the Co-Founder and Managing Director of GradGuard™. Fees is a graduate of Arizona State University, where he received a bachelors of science degree in History and is also a graduate of Harvard Business School where he completed a Masters in Business Administration. John Fees lives in Phoenix, Arizona and is married to Melissa Soza Fees, Ph.D. and is the father of five children. He is the Treasurer for the Arizona College Success Arizona, a Director of College Parents of America, Founding Director and investor in Tonto Creek Camp which provides service leadership experiences to 8,000 students annually. He is also an active member of University Risk Management and Insurance Association and the Professional Insurance Marketers Association.

Subscribe to Email Updates

Lists by Topic

see all

Posts by Topic

see all

Recent Posts